Results
Common Polish Y-DNA Clades
21-Nov-13
Peter Gwozdz
Polish Y-DNA Haplogroup Summary Table
Updated 19 Nov 2013, using data
download from the Polish Project
14 Nov 2013.
This table displays haplogroups that are most common in
Poland. The Polish Project is
considered representative of Historical Poland, with caveats explained in my Publication.
In the far right “Haplogroup”
column, most entries have a link for a jump to that part of a longer version of
this table (below).
These % frequencies include samples
tested positive for the corresponding SNPs,
and also include samples predicted for those SNPs, based on STR values.
ISOGG
Haplogroup codes effective 16 Nov 2013
More detailed tables are below. For full details of the analysis, see the
file ResultsTable.xls.
|
Haplogroup |
% |
Haplogroup |
% |
Haplogroup |
% |
Haplogroup |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CD |
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
CDEFGH |
9.2% |
6.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FGH |
2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6% |
|
|
Others |
42% |
Others |
41.8% |
IJ |
21.5% |
8.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTNQ |
10.8% |
8.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
< R Others
↓ ↓ |
1.8% |
|
R (M207) |
58% |
R1a1 |
47.7% |
R1a1a1b1a1 (M458) |
18.2% |
( L260) P Type |
9.5% |
|
|
|
(SRY 10831.2) |
|
|
|
(M458,L260-) N Type |
8.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2 (Z280) |
24.6% |
(CTS3402) |
13.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Z280, CTS3402-) |
11.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Others
↕ |
5.6% |
R1a1a1b2 (Z93) |
3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R1b1 (P25) |
10.5% |
R1b1a2a (L23) |
10.0% |
(L23) |
10.0% |
|
|
|
R2
↓ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
100% |
Largest Terminal Haplogroups and Paragroups
Updated 19 Nov 2013 using data
download from the Polish Project
14 Nov 2013.
These terminal haplogroups and paragroups would benefit most from an
effort to discover new SNPs.
Many of the following have links to
a description of the group.
The first column shows percent of
the Polish Project.
|
|
H |
= Terminal Haplogroup |
|
|
|
P |
= Terminal Paragroup |
|
|
9.5% |
H |
R1a-L260 |
P Type,
including Pc Cluster |
|
9.0% |
P |
R1a-CTS3402* |
CTS3402 other than 4 known small haplogroups; includes several types |
|
7.4% |
H |
R1a-L1029 |
N Type other
than Np Cluster & Nsmv |
|
6.5% |
H |
I2-L147.2,CTS5966,CTS10228 |
3 new SNPs seem equivalent; need more testing |
|
6.0% |
H |
R1a-Z92 |
Includes four types & clusters, & others |
|
5.8% |
P |
I1-L1025+, L58- |
|
|
2.8% |
H |
R1a-L365 |
|
|
2.8% |
P |
E-V13+,L17-,L540- |
V13* is also negative for other V13 branches that
are not in the project |
|
2.3% |
P |
R1a-Z280* |
Z280+, Z92-, CTS1211- |
|
2.3% |
P |
R1b-L23+, L51- |
Includes L23A Cluster, R1b-L23EE Type, & others |
|
2.2% |
H |
R1a-F1234 |
Mostly A type |
|
2.0% |
P |
R1a-CTS1211* |
Negative for multiple downstream SNPs |
|
1.6% |
P |
J-P58+, L147.1- |
|
|
1.4% |
H |
G-P15 |
|
|
1.3% |
H |
R1b-Z159 |
R1b-A type
and R1b-P type |
|
1.2% |
P |
R1a-CTS11962+,L1029- |
N type other
than L1029 |
|
1.1% |
H |
J-M241 |
|
|
1.1% |
H |
J-L25 |
|
|
1.1% |
P |
I1-L22+,P109- |
|
Largest Categories
Updated 19 Nov 2013 using data
download from the Polish Project
14 Nov 2013.
The following haplogroup codes are
FTDNA, which are not the same as the ISOGG codes, so be careful about haplogroup code confusion.
Many of the following have links to
a description of the category.
The R1a and I1 “Unassigned”
categories do not have frequencies, and are not represented in the Summary
Table above, because those have fewer than 67 STR markers, in haplogroups
requiring at least 67 markers for assignment.
The R1b “Unassigned” category does
have some samples with 67 or more markers, but these samples cannot be assigned
confidently, so the R1b categories were proportionally adjusted to account for
these, with proportional distribution.
For details of the analysis, see the
file ResultsTable.xls.
Generally, large categories tend to
represent common Polish Y-DNA tree branches that have experienced population
growth in recent millennia, so it is difficult to divide these categories using
STR correlations, and it has been difficult
to find SNPs to further divide these large
categories. However, this ranking may
be a bit misleading for four reasons:
(1) there has been an element of luck involved in finding SNPs over the
years; and (2) during the past year full Y readout has become commercially
available at reduced price, so some men are purchasing extensive Y tests to
find new SNPs in their Y-DNA branch; and (3) a new SNP provides a small
category until a sufficient number of men pay to test for that SNP; and (4)
some SNP categories are split into “+” and “predicted” and “credible” categories
if prediction based on STRs is not high confidence. So it is a bit arbitrary which common Polish categories have been
divided by recent new SNPs, and which categories remain large. The following table provides interesting
information about which categories would benefit from more research, but this
table should not be over interpreted.
|
Category |
All Samples |
67+ Markers |
Frequency |
|
256 |
|
- - - |
|
|
172 |
118 |
8.0% |
|
|
I2a2 - Predicted CTS5966+ CTS10228+ |
130 |
|
5.3% |
|
R1b1a2 - Unassigned (Need SNPs or Geno 2.0) |
94 |
|
- - - |
|
N1c1 - L1025+ Predicted |
92 |
|
3.7% |
|
E1b1b1a1b - V13+ Predicted |
66 |
|
2.7% |
|
R1a1a1 - Z280 Probable (Markers or SNPs Needed) |
61 |
13 |
0.9% |
|
R1a1a1g - N Type (L1029+ Predicted) |
58 |
42 |
2.8% |
|
R1a1a1g - L1029+ |
53 |
48 |
3.3% |
|
N1c1 - L1025+ |
50 |
|
2.0% |
|
R1a1a1 - F1345+ A Type (CTS6+ Predicted) |
41 |
32 |
2.2% |
|
R1a1a1 - Z92 E Type (Z92+ Predicted) |
35 |
34 |
2.3% |
|
G2a - P15+ Predicted |
35 |
|
1.4% |
|
I1 - Unassigned (Need Markers or SNPs) |
33 |
|
- - - |
|
J1c3 - P58+ Predicted |
28 |
|
1.1% |
|
J2b2 - M241+ Predicted |
27 |
|
1.1% |
|
R1a1a1 - J Type
(CTS3402+ Predicted) |
27 |
26 |
1.8% |
|
J2a4h2 - L25+ Predicted |
26 |
|
1.1% |
|
R1a1a1 - D Type
(CTS3402+ Predicted) |
26 |
21 |
1.1% |
|
R1a1a1 - I Type
(CTS3402+ Predicted) |
25 |
25 |
1.7% |
|
R1a1a1 - L365 G
Type (except Gb) (L365+ Predicted) |
25 |
21 |
1.4% |
Updated 20 Nov 2013 using data
download from the Polish Project
14 Nov 2013.
This is a longer, more detailed
Table than the three short tables above.
This has smaller categories.
However, most of the categories from the Polish Project are combined; many categories in this table have the total
data from two or more categories in the Polish Project.
“All” is the number of samples from
the Polish Project with 12 or more STR
markers. “67+” is the number of samples
from the Polish Project with 67 or more STR markers. Three of the major haplogroups require 67 markers for confident
assignment.
Many of the entries have a link for
a jump to a description of that particular category.
The category names are abbreviated. Since half the samples belong to R1a, “R1a”
is not used in most of the abbreviated category names; abbreviated names belong to R1a unless the
category name indicates otherwise.
The Polish Project has 211
assignment categories (14 Nov 2013).
The Polish Project has 2,555 samples with 12 or more STR values, but 89
were edited leaving 2,466 for this table.
Editing was for family sets and
other recruited samples, as explained in my Publication. For all the details of the analysis, see the
file ResultsTable.xls.
|
Haplogroup 16 Nov 2013 |
Category: or Paragroup
(*) |
All |
67+ |
% of Polish Project |
File |
|||
|
1.3 |
1.7 total 8.8 |
1.4 |
.5 |
.5 |
.7 |
1.4 |
.5 |
.8 |
|
C |
M216 |
11 |
|
0.45% |
|
|
|
|
|
D3a |
D |
P47 |
1 |
|
0.04% |
|
|
|
|
E* |
M96+V13-Z287- |
25 |
|
1.01% |
|
|
|
|
|
E1b1b1a1b |
E-V13 |
V13 |
73 |
|
2.96% |
|
|
|
|
E1b1b1b |
E-Z287 |
Z287 |
51 |
|
2.07% |
|
|
|
|
F-M89 |
M89 |
4 |
|
0.16% |
|
|
|
|
|
G |
G-M201 |
M201 |
59 |
|
2.39% |
|
|
|
|
H1a |
H |
M82 |
4 |
|
0.16% |
|
|
|
|
I1 Total |
M253 |
139 |
87 |
5.64% |
|
|
|
|
|
I1 |
I1-M253* |
M253+CTS6364- Z58-Z63- |
|
4 |
0.26% |
|
|
|
|
I1a1 |
CTS6364 |
|
10 |
0.65% |
6.4 |
|||
|
I1a1 |
I1-CTS6364* Other Than P |
CTS6364 |
|
36 |
2.33% |
|
|
|
|
I1a2 |
I1-Z58 |
Z58 |
|
23 |
1.49% |
|
|
|
|
Ia3 |
I1-Z63 |
Z63 |
|
14 |
0.91% |
|
|
|
|
I2* |
P215: CTS5966- |
52 |
|
2.11% |
|
|
|
|
|
I2a1b3a |
I2-CTS5966 |
CTS5966 |
159 |
|
6.45% |
|
|
|
|
J* |
M304+P58- M67- |
72 |
|
2.92% |
|
|
|
|
|
J1a2b |
J-P58 |
P58 |
40 |
|
1.62% |
|
|
|
|
J2a1b |
J-M67 |
M67 |
69 |
|
2.80% |
|
|
|
|
L |
M11 |
3 |
|
0.12% |
|
|
|
|
|
T |
M70 |
14 |
|
0.57% |
|
|
|
|
|
N* |
M231+L1025- |
32 |
|
1.30% |
|
|
|
|
|
N1c1a1a1a1 |
N1c1a1a1a1* |
L1025+L551- L592- |
148 |
|
6.00% |
|
|
|
|
N1c1a1a1a1a |
L551 |
21 |
|
0.85% |
11 |
|||
|
N1c1a1a1a1b |
L592 |
16 |
|
0.65% |
|
|||
|
Q |
L232 |
32 |
|
1.30% |
|
|
|
|
|
Haplogroup |
Category: |
SNP |
All |
67+ |
% |
File |
SBP |
Ysearch |
|
R1a1 Total |
SRY10831.2 |
1177 |
704 |
47.73% |
|
|
|
|
|
R1a1 |
R1a1* |
SRY10831.2+ Z283-Z93- |
|
4 |
0.27% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a |
Z282* |
Z282+M458- Z280-Z284- |
|
9 |
0.61% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a1 |
M458 Total |
M458 |
|
268 |
18.17% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a1 |
M458* |
M458+L260- CTS11062- |
|
2 |
0.14% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a1a |
P
Type Except Pc |
L260 |
|
119 |
8.07% |
9.1 |
||
|
R1a1a1b1a1a |
L260 |
|
21 |
1.42% |
28 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a1b |
Np Cluster |
CTS11962+ L1029- |
|
16 |
1.08% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a1b |
Nmsv |
CTS11962+ L1029- |
|
1 |
0.07% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a1b1 |
N
Type Start |
L1029 |
|
|
|
14 |
||
|
R1a1a1b1a1b1 |
L1029 |
|
5 |
0.34% |
47 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a1b1 |
L1029 |
|
4 |
0.27% |
16 |
|
||
|
R1a1a1b1a1b1 |
L1029 |
|
4 |
0.27% |
47 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a1b1 |
N Type Others |
L1029 |
|
96 |
6.51% |
|
|
|
|
Haplogroup |
Category: |
SNP |
All |
67+ |
% |
File |
SBP |
Ysearch |
|
R1a1a1b1a2 |
Z280 |
|
1088 |
24.61% |
|
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2 |
Z280* Z92- CTS1211- |
Z280+Z92- CTS1211- |
|
34 |
2.31% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2a |
Z92 Subtotal (Z280) |
Z92 |
|
88 |
5.97% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2a |
Z92y |
Z92 |
|
9 |
0.61% |
18 |
||
|
R1a1a1b1a2a |
Z92 |
|
34 |
2.31% |
14 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a2a |
Z92 Other Than E or y |
Z92 |
|
45 |
3.05% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2b |
CTS1211 Subtotal (within Z280) |
CTS1211 |
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2b |
CTS1211 |
|
10 |
0.68% |
27 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a2b |
CTS1211 |
|
6 |
0.41% |
23 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a2b |
CTS1211* Others |
CTS1211+ P278-L784- CTS3402- |
|
13 |
0.88% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2b1 |
P278 |
|
11 |
0.75% |
15 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a2b2 |
L784 |
L784 |
|
2 |
0.14% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3 |
CTS3402 Subtotal (within CTS1211) |
CTS3402 |
|
199 |
13.49% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3 |
CTS3402 |
|
16 |
1.08% |
12 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3 |
B Borderline |
CTS3402 |
|
18 |
1.22% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3 |
CTS3402 |
|
21 |
1.42% |
18 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3 |
CTS3402 |
|
25 |
1.69% |
12 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3 |
CTS3402 |
|
3 |
0.20% |
12 |
|
||
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3 |
CTS3402 |
|
26 |
1.76% |
13 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3 |
Kz Type |
CTS3402 |
|
5 |
0.34% |
11 |
||
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3 |
CTS3402* Others |
CTS3402+ L365-L366- CTS11142- |
|
19 |
1.36% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3a |
L365 |
|
41 |
2.78% |
11 |
|||
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3b |
L366 |
L366 |
|
7 |
0.47% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3c |
L1280 |
L1280 |
|
17 |
1.15% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b1a2b3d |
CTS11142 |
CTS11142 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
End M458, Z280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haplogroup |
Category: |
SNP |
All |
67+ |
% |
File |
SBP |
Ysearch |
|
R1a1a1b1a3 |
Z284 |
Z284 |
|
3 |
0.20% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b2 |
Z93 |
|
57 |
3.86% |
|
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b2 |
Z93* |
Z93+CTS6- |
|
25 |
1.69% |
|
|
|
|
R1a1a1b2 |
CTS6 |
|
32 |
2.17% |
5.9 |
|||
|
|
End R1a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R1b1 |
M25+M269-L23- |
6 |
|
0.24% |
|
|
|
|
|
R1b1a2 |
R1b1a2 Total |
M269 |
252 |
104 |
10.22% |
|
|
|
|
R1b1a2 |
R1b-M269* |
M269+L23- |
|
2 |
0.20% |
|
|
|
|
R1b1a2a |
R1b-L23* |
L23+L51-Z2103- |
|
5 |
0.49% |
|
|
|
|
R1b1a2a1 |
R1b-L51* |
L51+P310- |
|
2 |
0.20% |
|
|
|
|
R1b1a2a1a |
R1b-P310* |
P310+ U106- P312- |
|
3 |
0.29% |
|
|
|
|
R1b1a2a1a1 |
R1b-U106* |
U106+ Z381- |
|
13 |
1.28% |
|
|
|
|
R1b1a2a1a1c |
R1b-Z381* |
Z381+ Z159- |
|
20 |
1.97% |
|
|
|
|
R1b1a2a1a1c2b1b |
Z159 |
|
5 |
0.49% |
7.6 |
|||
|
R1b1a2a1a1c2b1b |
Z159 |
|
8 |
0.79% |
9.3 |
|||
|
R1b1a2a1a2 |
R1b-P312* |
P312 |
|
28 |
2.75% |
|
|
|
|
R1b1a2a2 |
Z2103+L584- |
|
15 |
1.47% |
11 |
|||
|
R1b1a2a2a |
R1b-A Cluster |
L584 |
|
3 |
0.29% |
|
|
|
|
|
End R1b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R2 |
M123 |
6 |
|
0.24% |
|
|
|
Revision History
2011
Sep 10 Initiate this document by moving table from PolishCladesl.html
2011
Four updates after Sep 10
2012
Feb 8 update the first 3 columns of the Summary Table
2012
Feb 11 finish update of the Summary Table
2012
Feb 12 update the detailed Results Table, except R section is not updated yet
2012
Feb 13 new Table of Largest Clades in Results
2012
Feb 14 Results update finished
2012
Feb 15 multiple edits
2012
Mar 8 Kx correction
2012
Mar 8 new columns for analysis file links;
some links added; not all yet
2012
Mar 9 finish analysis files links
2013
Nov 6 Update of the Summary Table (full table not updated yet)
2013
Nov 8 “Largest Categories” new topic
2013
Nov 17 “Largest Terminal Haplogroups and Paragroups” new topic
2013
Nov 18 Update of Summary Table and Largest Categories
2013
Nov 19 Update of Summary Table and Largest Categories
2013
Nov 20 Update of Results Table - the long one
2013
Nov 21 Update; minor edits